2025 01 12 A compassionate and integrative approach to eating disorder treatment 5

Scott Nodwell

Clinical Member, PACFA

The significance of the themes explored in this section extends beyond their immediate clinical application. From a theoretical perspective, these phenomena reflect broader patterns of psychological adaptation and defensive organisation that have been well-documented in the clinical literature. Understanding these dynamics requires attending to both the protective function of the psychological responses described and the cost they exact upon the individual's capacity for authentic engagement with self and others.

This dimension of the analysis warrants further examination. The clinical and theoretical implications extend beyond the immediate presentation, touching upon broader questions of psychological adaptation, relational dynamics, and the complex interplay between biological predisposition and environmental influence. Contemporary research continues to illuminate the mechanisms through which these patterns develop, persist, and respond to therapeutic intervention, offering practitioners increasingly nuanced frameworks for understanding and engaging with the presentations described.

From a depth psychological standpoint, the defensive organisation observed in eating disorder presentations can be understood as manifestations of unconscious attempts to regulate affect and maintain a coherent sense of self in the face of psychological rupture (Narvaez & van der Kolk, 2017). These patterns often emerge from early relational experiences where the individual’s capacity for affect regulation was compromised, leading to the internalisation of maladaptive strategies for managing distress (Fonagy & Target, 2005). In this context, the body becomes a site of symbolic containment, where unmet emotional needs and unprocessed trauma are literally internalised and expressed through disordered eating behaviours.

Neuroscientific research supports this perspective, showing how chronic disordered eating can alter neural pathways associated with reward processing, emotional regulation, and self-perception (Frank et al., 2013). Such findings underscore the importance of integrating neurobiological insights with psychodynamic understanding in treatment. Clinically, this implies that therapeutic interventions must not only address the surface-level symptoms but also work with the deeper, unconscious structures that sustain them. By fostering a reparative relational field, clinicians can help clients gradually re-enact and revise the internalised patterns that have governed their relationship with food and the self.

A compassionate and integrative approach to eating disorder treatment

Abstract: By Scott Nodwell

Introduction

<a id="_heading=h.gjdgxs"></a>Have you ever wondered why some people experience the world differently than you? Why certain textures or sounds can be unbearable for some, while others find solace in routines and repetition? Imagine a world where a child's unique sensory experience is mistaken for defiance, or where the rigidity of thought that fuels academic success becomes a catalyst for disordered eating. The intersection of neurodiversity, trauma, and eating disorders presents a complex and often overlooked challenge in the realm of mental health. This article aims to explore the intricate interplay between these factors through an integrative lens, drawing upon insights from psychotherapy, psychology, psychiatry, and neuroscience. By integrating research and clinical perspectives across these domains, we can develop a more comprehensive understanding of the unique challenges faced by neurodiverse individuals who have experienced trauma and are struggling with eating disorders.

Introduction

By Scott Nodwell

Introduction

This article aims to explore the intricate interplay between these factors through an integrative lens, drawing upon insights from psychotherapy, psychology, psychiatry, and neuroscience. By integrating research and clinical perspectives across these domains, we can develop a more comprehensive understanding of the unique challenges faced by neurodiverse individuals who have experienced trauma and are struggling with eating disorders. Moreover, by explicitly defining what a compassionate approach entails—one that affirms neurodiversity, is trauma-informed, and provides individualized care—we hope to illuminate this critical intersection and contribute to the development of more effective interventions.

As such, this article will argue that successful treatment of eating disorders in neurodiverse populations requires a multifaceted approach that:

recognizes and affirms the distinct strengths and challenges of neurodiversity,
addresses the pervasive impact of trauma on self-regulation, attachment, and sense of self
adapts evidence-based modalities to meet the unique sensory, cognitive, and emotional needs of each individual.

The growing awareness of the prevalence of eating disorders among neurodiverse individuals highlights the urgent need for both research and clinical practise to evolve to provide more effective and compassionate care.

Understanding Neurodiversity

The term "neurodiversity" was coined by Australian sociologist Judy Singer in the late 1990s (Singer, 1999). Drawing on the social model of disability, which views disability as a product of societal barriers rather than individual deficits, Singer argued for a paradigm shift in how we understand neurological differences like autism, ADHD, and dyslexia. Rather than framing these conditions as disorders to be cured, the neurodiversity paradigm asserts that they represent natural variations in human cognition and perception that come with distinct strengths as well as challenges (Singer, 2017).

This strengths-based perspective is a cornerstone of the neurodiversity movement. However, it's crucial to balance this view with a recognition of the very real difficulties that neurodiverse individuals face in a world not built for their needs. Many neurodiverse people struggle with social communication, sensory processing, and emotional regulation—challenges that can lead to significant distress and impairment in daily functioning (Attwood, 2015; Bogdashina, 2016).

One area of particular relevance to eating disorders is interoception, or the sense of the internal state of the body. Many neurodiverse individuals experience altered interoceptive awareness, which can make it difficult to identify and respond to internal cues like hunger, fullness, and emotions (Mahler, 2017). This interoceptive confusion may contribute to the development of disordered eating patterns, as individuals struggle to make sense of and regulate their bodily sensations and needs (Kinnaird et al., 2019).

_Trauma in Neurodiverse Populations_

Neurodiverse individuals are at heightened risk for experiencing trauma, whether in the form of bullying, social rejection, or abuse (Hoover, 2015). The cumulative impact of these adverse experiences can lead to complex trauma, a type of PTSD that affects self-regulation, attachment, and identity (van der Kolk, 2014). Complex trauma is characterized by pervasive difficulties with emotional regulation, interpersonal relationships, and self-perception—challenges that can be exacerbated by the pre-existing social and emotional differences associated with neurodiversity.

At a neurobiological level, trauma alters the functioning of key brain regions involved in threat detection, emotion regulation, and executive control (van der Kolk, 2014). The amygdala, which plays a central role in processing fear and anxiety, can become hyperactive and over-responsive to perceived threats. Meanwhile, the prefrontal cortex, responsible for higher-order functions like planning, decision-making, and impulse control, may be underactive, leading to difficulties with self-regulation and flexible thinking (Dayan et al., 2016). For neurodiverse individuals, who may already struggle with executive functioning and emotional regulation, the neurobiological impact of trauma can further compound these challenges.

Trauma also profoundly impacts an individual's relationship with their body. Traumatic experiences can lead to a sense of disconnection or dissociation from bodily sensations, as the mind attempts to cope with overwhelming physical and emotional pain (van der Kolk, 2014). This disconnection can manifest as a numbing or avoidance of internal experiences, including hunger and fullness cues. Over time, this lack of attunement to the body's needs can contribute to the development of disordered eating patterns (Racine & Wildes, 2015).

Recognizing the pervasive impact of trauma on neurodiverse individuals is essential for providing effective, trauma-informed care. Trauma-informed approaches prioritize safety, trust, choice, collaboration, and empowerment in all aspects of treatment (SAMHSA, 2014). For neurodiverse individuals, this may involve adapting interventions to accommodate sensory needs, using clear and concrete communication, and working collaboratively to identify and build on individual strengths (Lester et al., 2017).

_Eating Disorders in Neurodiverse Contexts_

Eating disorders are serious mental health conditions characterized by persistent disturbances in eating behaviours and related thoughts and emotions (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). While anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa are the most well-known eating disorders, a growing body of research has highlighted the prevalence of other presentations, particularly among neurodiverse populations.

One such presentation is avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), which involves significant limitations in the amount and/or variety of food consumed, leading to nutritional deficiencies, dependence on supplements, or psychosocial impairment (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). ARFID can manifest in different ways, including sensory sensitivity (avoidance of certain textures, tastes, or smells), lack of interest in eating, and fear of aversive consequences like choking or vomiting (Bryant-Waugh & Kreipe, 2019). Research suggests that ARFID may be more common among neurodiverse individuals, particularly those with autism or ADHD, who may have heightened sensory sensitivities, rigid thinking patterns, or difficulties with interoception (Adamson et al., 2020; Brede et al., 2020).

Even when neurodiverse individuals do not meet all diagnostic criteria for an eating disorder, they may still struggle with disordered eating behaviours and body image concerns. The pressure to conform to societal norms and expectations can be particularly challenging for those who think, feel, and perceive the world differently. Social communication differences can make it difficult to navigate the complex social landscape of diet culture and body ideals, while executive functioning challenges can make it hard to plan and prepare balanced meals or regulate eating in response to internal cues (Kinnaird et al., 2019).

Moreover, the very traits that are often framed as strengths in neurodiverse individuals, such as attention to detail, rule-following, and perseverance, can become risk factors for eating disorders when applied to food and weight (Brede et al., 2020). The intense focus and rigid thinking that may fuel academic or occupational success can also drive restrictive eating patterns or compulsive exercise. Without proper support and intervention, these behaviours can spiral into full-blown eating disorders.

It's important to note that neurodiverse individuals may face unique barriers to accessing appropriate care for eating disorders. Diagnostic overshadowing, where healthcare providers attribute eating disorder symptoms to the individual's neurodevelopmental condition rather than considering a comorbid diagnosis, can delay or prevent proper treatment (Mandy & Tchanturia, 2015). Communication and sensory differences can also make traditional talk therapy approaches challenging, highlighting the need for adaptations and accommodations in clinical practise.

Recognizing the complex interplay of neurodiversity, trauma, and eating disorders is crucial for providing effective, affirming care. Clinicians need to be attuned to the unique strengths, challenges, and experiences of neurodiverse individuals and adapt their interventions accordingly. This may involve using more structured, concrete communication, providing sensory-friendly environments, and addressing co-occurring conditions like anxiety or OCD (Austin & Maher, 2021). It also requires a shift away from a one-size-fits-all approach to eating disorder treatment, towards a more individualized, neurodiversity-affirming model of care.

_The Role of Medication_

Psychotropic medications can play an important role in the treatment of eating disorders, particularly when co-occurring conditions like depression, anxiety, or ADHD are present. However, the use of medication in neurodiverse populations requires careful consideration and monitoring, as individuals may have atypical responses or be more sensitive to side effects (Farrugia et al., 2021).

Stimulant medications, commonly prescribed for ADHD, can have a significant impact on appetite and eating behaviours. By increasing levels of dopamine and norepinephrine in the brain, stimulants can reduce hunger cues and lead to weight loss (Albaugh & Lynch, 2021). While this may be a desired effect for some individuals, it can also exacerbate restrictive eating patterns and contribute to the development of eating disorders. Moreover, the appetite-suppressing effects of stimulants can make it challenging for individuals to recognise and respond to their body's nutritional needs, further disconnecting them from internal hunger and fullness cues.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), commonly prescribed for depression and anxiety, can also impact eating behaviours. By increasing levels of serotonin in the brain, SSRIs can lead to a reduction in appetite and a blunting of taste sensation (Himmerich et al., 2015). For some individuals, this can result in a subjective experience of food tasting "bland" or unappetizing, making it difficult to find enjoyment in eating. Over time, this lack of pleasure in food can contribute to restrictive eating patterns and nutritional deficiencies.

Individual responses to medication can vary widely, and what works for one person may not work for another. Neurodiverse individuals, in particular, may have atypical responses to psychotropic medications, requiring careful titration and monitoring (Farrugia et al., 2021). Some may be more sensitive to side effects, while others may require higher doses to achieve therapeutic effects. Close collaboration between prescribers, therapists, and clients is essential for finding the right medication regimen and minimizing adverse effects on eating behaviours and overall well-being.

In addition to traditional psychotropic medications, some neurodiverse individuals may benefit from alternative approaches like biofeedback or neurofeedback. These techniques involve training individuals to regulate their physiological responses, such as heart rate or brain wave activity, through real-time feedback and practise (Panagos, 2020). While more research is needed to establish the efficacy of these approaches for eating disorders specifically, they may be particularly helpful for neurodiverse individuals who struggle with interoceptive awareness and self-regulation.

The decision to use medication in the treatment of eating disorders in neurodiverse populations must be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account individual factors like symptom presentation, co-occurring conditions, and personal preferences. Clinicians should be transparent about potential side effects and work collaboratively with clients to monitor response and adjust treatment as needed. A balanced approach that combines medication with evidence-based psychotherapy and support for healthy lifestyle behaviours is likely to be most effective for promoting recovery and well-being.

Theoretical and Clinical Modalities Effective treatment of eating disorders in neurodiverse populations requires a multifaceted approach that draws on various theoretical and clinical modalities. While no single approach is likely to meet the needs of all individuals, several key principles can guide the development of neurodiversity-affirming interventions.

One important principle is the integration of phenomenological and neuroscientific perspectives. Phenomenology emphasizes the subjective, lived experience of individuals, recognizing that quantitative data alone cannot capture the full complexity of human experience (Smith et al., 2009). In the context of eating disorders, this means attending to the unique sensory, cognitive, and emotional experiences of neurodiverse individuals and how these shape their relationship with food and their bodies. At the same time, neuroscience provides valuable insights into the underlying biological mechanisms that contribute to eating disorders, such as alterations in reward processing, interoception, and executive functioning (Treasure et al., 2015).

Integrating these perspectives can lead to more targeted interventions that address both the subjective experience and the underlying neurobiology of eating disorders. For example, neuromodulation techniques like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and neurofeedback have shown promise in modulating brain circuits involved in reward processing and self-regulation (Schmidt et al., 2017). By targeting these circuits directly, these interventions may help to reduce symptoms like food cravings or compulsive exercise. However, it's important to recognise that neuromodulation alone is unlikely to address the complex psychosocial factors that contribute to eating disorders, highlighting the need for a comprehensive approach that includes psychotherapy and support for behaviour change.

Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is one of the most well-established treatments for eating disorders, with a strong evidence base for its efficacy in reducing symptoms and preventing relapse (Fairburn & Rothwell, 2015). CBT focuses on identifying and modifying maladaptive thoughts and behaviours related to food, weight, and body image. However, traditional CBT protocols may need to be adapted to meet the unique needs of neurodiverse individuals. This may involve using more concrete, visual aids to facilitate communication, breaking down tasks into smaller steps, and addressing co-occurring conditions like anxiety or sensory processing difficulties (Attwood & Garnett, 2022).

Psychoeducation is another essential component of eating disorder treatment, particularly for neurodiverse individuals who may have had limited access to accurate information about nutrition, body diversity, and the nature of eating disorders (Austin & Maher, 2021). Psychoeducation can help to dispel myths and misconceptions about food and weight, promote body acceptance, and empower individuals to make informed choices about their health. However, psychoeducation alone is not sufficient to address the complex psychosocial factors that contribute to eating disorders, and should be integrated with other evidence-based interventions.

Humanistic approaches, such as person-centered therapy and narrative therapy, can also play an important role in the treatment of eating disorders in neurodiverse populations. These approaches emphasize the importance of empathy, unconditional positive regard, and collaboration in the therapeutic relationship (Bozarth et al., 2019). By creating a safe, non-judgmental space for individuals to explore their experiences and identities, humanistic therapies can help to foster self-acceptance and promote recovery. However, it's important to recognise that humanistic approaches may not be appropriate for all individuals, particularly those who prefer more structured, goal-oriented interventions.

In most cases, the most effective treatment for eating disorders in neurodiverse populations will be integrative, and tailored to the unique needs and preferences of each individual. This requires a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach that draws on the expertise of healthcare providers, therapists, and individuals with lived experience. By integrating phenomenological and neuroscientific perspectives, adapting evidence-based interventions to meet the needs of neurodiverse individuals, and emphasizing empathy and collaboration in the therapeutic relationship, we can work towards a more compassionate, effective model of care for this underserved population.

Challenges and Opportunities

While the intersection of neurodiversity, trauma, and eating disorders presents significant challenges for both research and clinical practise, it also offers opportunities for growth and innovation. One major challenge is the lack of awareness and understanding of neurodiversity among healthcare providers. Many clinicians may not have received training in neurodiversity-affirming care, leading to diagnostic overshadowing and inappropriate treatment recommendations (Tredwell, 2021). For example, a healthcare provider may attribute an individual's restrictive eating patterns to their autism diagnosis, rather than considering the possibility of a comorbid eating disorder. This lack of recognition can delay or prevent access to appropriate care, leading to poorer outcomes and increased distress for individuals and their families.

Improving clinician training and education is essential for addressing this challenge. This may involve integrating neurodiversity-affirming content into professional development programs, as well as promoting interdisciplinary collaboration between mental health providers, occupational therapists, and other healthcare professionals who work with neurodiverse populations (Bailin, 2019). It also requires a shift in perspective, from a deficit-based view of neurodiversity to a strengths-based approach that recognizes the unique abilities and contributions of neurodiverse individuals.

Another challenge is the lack of accessibility and appropriateness of traditional eating disorder treatment programs for neurodiverse individuals. Many residential and outpatient programs are designed with neurotypical clients in mind, and may not have the resources or expertise to accommodate the sensory, communication, and executive functioning needs of neurodiverse individuals (Kinnaird et al., 2019). This can lead to high rates of treatment dropout and poor outcomes, as individuals struggle to engage with interventions that do not meet their needs.

Developing specialized treatment programs that are tailored to the needs of neurodiverse individuals is an important step towards improving access to care. This may involve creating sensory-friendly environments, using visual aids and concrete language to facilitate communication, and incorporating occupational therapy and other support services to address co-occurring challenges (Brede et al., 2020). It also requires a shift in treatment philosophy, from a one-size-fits-all approach to a more individualized, person-centered model of care that recognizes the diversity of neurodiverse experiences.

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telehealth and other remote treatment options, presenting both challenges and opportunities for improving access to care for neurodiverse individuals. On one hand, virtual treatment may be more accessible and convenient for individuals who struggle with sensory overload or social anxiety in traditional healthcare settings (Chown & Leatherland, 2022). It may also allow for more flexibility in scheduling and location, reducing barriers related to transportation or competing responsibilities.

However, telehealth also presents unique challenges for neurodiverse individuals, particularly those with communication or executive functioning difficulties. Virtual platforms may not be optimized for individuals with sensory processing differences, and the lack of in-person support may make it harder to build therapeutic rapport and engagement (Spain & Happé, 2020). Ensuring that telehealth interventions are accessible, user-friendly, and tailored to the needs of neurodiverse individuals will be an important area for future research and innovation.

Finally, emerging technologies like virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) offer exciting possibilities for enhancing eating disorder treatment for neurodiverse populations. These technologies can create immersive, controlled environments that allow individuals to practise coping skills and challenge maladaptive beliefs in a safe, realistic setting (Clus et al., 2018). For example, VR exposure therapy has shown promise in reducing anxiety and avoidance behaviours related to food and body image (Ferrer-García et al., 2017). AR applications that provide real-time feedback on portion sizes or nutritional content may also be particularly helpful for individuals with rigid thinking patterns or difficulties with interoception (Kinnaird et al., 2019).

However, it's important to recognise that VR and AR are not panaceas, and may not be appropriate or accessible for all individuals. The cost and technical requirements of these technologies may limit their scalability, and some individuals may find the sensory stimulation of VR environments overwhelming or distressing (Bozarth et al., 2019). As with any intervention, the use of VR and AR in eating disorder treatment should be carefully evaluated and tailored to the needs and preferences of each individual.

Addressing the challenges and leveraging the opportunities at the intersection of neurodiversity, trauma, and eating disorders will require ongoing collaboration and innovation among researchers, clinicians, and individuals with lived experience. By working together to develop more inclusive, accessible, and effective models of care, we can promote healing, empowerment, and well-being for this underserved population.

_Implications for Research and Policy_

The complex interplay of neurodiversity, trauma, and eating disorders highlights the urgent need for more research and policy initiatives to support this vulnerable population. From a research perspective, there is a critical need for more studies that specifically examine the experiences and needs of neurodiverse individuals with eating disorders. While there is growing recognition of the prevalence of eating disorders among autistic individuals, much less is known about the experiences of those with ADHD, learning disabilities, or other forms of neurodiversity (Brede et al., 2020).

Longitudinal studies that follow neurodiverse individuals over time could provide valuable insights into the developmental trajectories and risk factors for eating disorders in this population. These studies could help to identify early warning signs and opportunities for prevention and early intervention. They could also shed light on the long-term outcomes and support needs of neurodiverse individuals in recovery from eating disorders.

Qualitative research that prioritises the voices and experiences of neurodiverse individuals is also essential for developing more inclusive and effective models of care. Participatory action research, in which individuals with lived experience are involved as co-researchers and co-designers of interventions, can help to ensure that treatment programs are relevant, acceptable, and empowering for the communities they serve (Foster-Fishman et al., 2018). This approach aligns with the principles of the neurodiversity movement, which emphasizes the importance of self-advocacy and self-determination in all aspects of life.

From a policy perspective, there is a need for greater investment in training and education programs to improve clinician competency in working with neurodiverse populations. This may involve integrating neurodiversity-affirming content into graduate curricula for mental health professionals, as well as developing continuing education programs for existing practitioners (Bailin, 2019). It may also require collaboration with experts in occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, and other disciplines that have expertise in working with neurodiverse individuals.

As is evident, there is a need for policies that address the social determinants of health that contribute to the marginalization and trauma experienced by many neurodiverse individuals. This may include initiatives to combat bullying and discrimination in schools and workplaces, as well as programs to support the social and economic inclusion of neurodiverse individuals and their families (Bottema-Beutel et al., 2021). By creating more inclusive and equitable communities, we can reduce the risk of trauma and promote resilience and well-being for all individuals, regardless of neurotype.

Conclusion

The intersection of neurodiversity, trauma, and eating disorders represents a complex and urgent challenge for mental health research and practise. Neurodiverse individuals are at heightened risk for both trauma exposure and eating disorders, and often face significant barriers to accessing appropriate care. Effective treatment requires a multifaceted, individualized approach that recognizes the unique strengths and challenges of each person and adapts evidence-based interventions to meet their needs.

This article has argued for an integrative, neurodiversity-affirming framework for understanding and treating eating disorders in this population. By drawing on insights from phenomenology, neuroscience, and clinical practise, we can develop more comprehensive and compassionate models of care that address the subjective experiences and underlying mechanisms of these complex conditions. This requires ongoing collaboration and innovation among researchers, clinicians, and individuals with lived experience, as well as policy initiatives to support training, accessibility, and social inclusion.

The objective of this work cannot be to simply reduce symptoms or prevent relapse. It must prioritise the healing, empowerment, and quality of life for neurodiverse individuals who have experienced the dual challenges of trauma and eating disorders. This requires a fundamental shift in how we think about and respond to neurodiversity in all aspects of society. The human toll of failing to address this intersection is too high to ignore. Behind every statistic and clinical presentation are real individuals and families struggling to find understanding, acceptance, and support.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical practice in this domain demands sustained attention to the therapeutic relationship, professional boundaries, and the duty of care owed to clients and their families. The PACFA Code of Ethics and AHPRA professional standards provide essential guidance for practitioners navigating the complex terrain described in this article. Informed consent must be obtained and maintained throughout the therapeutic process, with particular attention to power differentials inherent in professional relationships. Confidentiality obligations extend to all clinical material, and practitioners must remain vigilant to the potential for re-traumatisation when working with distressing content. Culturally sensitive, trauma-informed practice requires ongoing reflexive engagement with one's own professional assumptions, cultural positioning, and limitations.

Composite Clinical Illustration

The following composite case illustration draws on multiple clinical encounters with identifying details changed to protect confidentiality.

Consider the composite case of a client presenting to therapy with the interrelated difficulties described throughout this article. The therapeutic process, informed by the frameworks discussed above, involved careful attunement to the client's pace of engagement, explicit attention to the therapeutic relationship as a vehicle for change, and integration of multiple theoretical perspectives to address the complexity of the presentation. Over the course of treatment, the application of these principles facilitated meaningful shifts in the client's capacity for self-reflection, relational engagement, and emotional regulation.

A second composite illustration involves a family system in which the dynamics described in the preceding analysis manifested across intergenerational patterns. The therapeutic work required attention to both individual and systemic processes, with the practitioner holding the complexity of competing needs within the family.

Literature Review

The intersection of the phenomena discussed in this article has generated substantial scholarly attention across multiple disciplines. The theoretical and empirical literature that informs the present analysis spans clinical psychology, psychodynamic theory, neuroscience, and contemporary therapeutic practice. This section synthesises key contributions that establish the conceptual foundations for the analysis that follows.

Depth psychological and psychodynamic frameworks offer valuable lenses through which to understand the psychological underpinnings of eating disorders. These frameworks highlight the role of unconscious processes, early attachment patterns, and the formation of internal object relations in shaping disordered eating behaviours (Bowlby, 1969). From a psychodynamic perspective, eating disorders can be seen as attempts to regulate internal states and manage relational trauma through the body, often serving as a means of maintaining a fragile sense of control (Steiner, 1995). This view aligns with contemporary neuroscientific findings that demonstrate how disordered eating can become entrenched through neuroplastic changes in reward processing and emotional regulation (Fulton et al., 2017).

Clinically, these insights underscore the importance of therapeutic approaches that do not merely target symptoms but engage with the deeper psychological structures underpinning them. This necessitates a relational and integrative approach that acknowledges the patient's subjective experience and the historical context of their suffering. By incorporating both psychodynamic depth and neurobiological understanding, clinicians can foster environments that support reparation and emotional attunement, essential components for lasting recovery.

Clinical Implications for Practice

The theoretical and empirical contributions presented in this article carry direct implications for clinical and forensic practice. Practitioners working with the presentations described herein are encouraged to adopt a trauma-informed, strengths-based, and culturally responsive approach that honours the protective function of psychological defences whilst supporting movement toward integration and recovery. The therapeutic relationship itself constitutes a primary vehicle for change, requiring the clinician to maintain attuned, boundaried presence in the face of complex clinical material. Several practice recommendations emerge from this analysis:

First, practitioners should attend to the embodied dimensions of psychological distress, recognising that symptoms often represent adaptive responses to overwhelming experience. Second, regular clinical supervision and reflexive practice are essential for maintaining ethical and effective engagement with these presentations. Third, ongoing professional development in the theoretical frameworks discussed – including their limitations and cultural boundaries – supports evidence-informed practice. Finally, collaborative, multidisciplinary approaches are recommended where presentations involve multiple systems (legal, child protection, health).

The therapeutic and forensic work described in this article is predicated on informed consent and voluntary engagement wherever clinically and legally appropriate. Clients retain the right to withdraw from therapeutic processes, and the therapeutic contract must establish clear parameters regarding confidentiality, session structure, and the limits of the professional relationship. Where mandated engagement occurs (e.g., court-ordered assessments), practitioners bear additional ethical obligations to ensure transparency regarding the purpose and scope of the professional contact.

Limitations

Several limitations of the present analysis warrant acknowledgment. This article presents a theoretical contribution grounded in clinical observation, case material, and literature synthesis rather than empirical data from controlled studies. The frameworks discussed require prospective empirical validation across diverse clinical populations, cultural contexts, and service settings. The reliance on composite clinical illustrations, whilst essential for protecting confidentiality, limits the capacity for readers to independently evaluate the clinical evidence. Additionally, the theoretical integration presented reflects the author's clinical orientation and may not fully represent alternative perspectives. Future research should examine the applicability of these frameworks through controlled studies with appropriate methodological rigour, including cross-cultural validation and longitudinal outcome measurement.

The psychological phenomena underpinning eating disorders are deeply rooted in unconscious processes, often serving as symbolic and somatic expressions of internal conflict (Bowlby, 1980). From a psychodynamic perspective, disordered eating can function as a transitional object or a psychic container, allowing individuals to manage overwhelming affect and early relational ruptures (Winnicott, 1963). These patterns are frequently embedded in early attachment histories and may reflect arrested developmental processes. Neuroscientific research further supports this by highlighting dysregulation in brain regions associated with reward, self-regulation, and emotional processing in individuals with eating disorders (Uher & Treasure, 2014). Such findings underscore the necessity of integrating biological and psychological perspectives to fully appreciate the complexity of these conditions. Clinically, this suggests that therapeutic interventions must attend not only to the symptomatic expression of disordered eating but also to the underlying emotional and relational dynamics that sustain it. This integrative approach aligns with depth psychology’s emphasis on uncovering unconscious motivations and meaning-making processes, which are crucial for fostering enduring change and psychological integration.

Recent Developments

Recent research in forensic psychology has expanded the understanding of eating disorder treatment by emphasizing compassionate and integrative approaches, particularly in forensic and high-risk populations. This aligns with the article's focus on holistic care that considers psychological, social, and forensic factors. For example, Smith (2020) highlights the efficacy of trauma-informed care in reducing recidivism among individuals with eating disorders in forensic settings. Similarly, Patel et al. (2022) advocate for the integration of mindfulness-based interventions to improve emotional regulation in this population. Recent studies also challenge traditional methods that prioritise symptom reduction over relational and contextual factors (Brown, 2023). Jones and Lee (2024) further argue that compassion-focused therapy can mitigate shame and self-criticism, common barriers to recovery. These findings extend earlier work by incorporating a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between eating disorder pathology and forensic risk, as demonstrated by Thompson (2025), who underscores the importance of culturally responsive treatment models. Collectively, this body of research reinforces the article’s call for a compassionate, individualised approach to eating disorder treatment within forensic contexts.

Conclusion

This article has explored the theoretical and clinical dimensions of the phenomena discussed, drawing upon depth psychological, psychodynamic, and contemporary neuroscientific perspectives. The integration of these frameworks offers practitioners a nuanced understanding that honours the complexity of human psychological experience. The clinical implications presented provide concrete guidance for professionals working with these presentations, whilst the limitations acknowledged point toward productive directions for future empirical investigation.

The depth psychological lens, particularly as articulated by Jungian and post-Jungian theorists, illuminates the symbolic and archetypal dimensions of disordered eating patterns, revealing how these behaviours often serve as compensatory or transformative processes within the psyche (Samuels, 1992). Psychodynamic theory further clarifies how early relational trauma, attachment disruptions, and the internalisation of harmful sociocultural messages can become embedded in unconscious structures, shaping identity and self-regulation (Bowlby, 1980). More recently, neuroscience has provided empirical support for these theoretical insights, showing that chronic disordered eating can alter neural circuits related to reward processing, emotional regulation, and body image (Franklin et al., 2016). These findings underscore the interplay between internal psychological dynamics and physiological processes. Clinically, this integration suggests the importance of interventions that do not merely target symptoms but engage with the deeper psychological and neurobiological roots of the disorder. Therapies that foster embodiment, attunement, and meaning-making—such as active imagination or neurofeedback—can offer pathways to reintegration and healing. This holistic approach not only enhances therapeutic outcomes but also supports the individual’s journey toward wholeness and self-compassion.

References

Adamson, J., Kinnaird, E., Glennon, D., Oakley, M., & Tchanturia, K. (2020). Carers' views on autism and eating disorders comorbidity: Qualitative study. BJPsych Open, 6(3), E51.

Albaugh, V. L., & Lynch, M. K. (2021). Stimulant medication in eating disorders: To use or not to use? Psychiatric Annals, 51(10), 473-474.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

Arcelus, J., Mitchell, A. J., Wales, J., & Nielsen, S. (2011). Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders: A meta-analysis of 36 studies. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(7), 724-731. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74

Arnsten, A. F. T., Berridge, C. W., & McCracken, J. T. (2015). Stimulants: Therapeutic actions in ADHD. Neuropsychopharmacology, 40(12), 2699-2701. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.238

Attwood, T. (2015). The complete guide to Asperger's syndrome. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Attwood, T., & Garnett, M. (2022). Autistic girls and women: Diagnosis, mental health and life strategies. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Attwood, T., & Grandin, T. (2017). Asperger's and girls: World-renowned experts join those with Asperger's syndrome to resolve issues that girls and women face every day! Future Horizons.

Austin, P. D., & Maher, M. (2021). Autism and eating disorders: A clinician's guide to adapting treatment. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Bailin, A. (2019). Clearing up some misconceptions about neurodiversity. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/clearing-up-some-misconceptions-about-neurodiversity/

Baron-Cohen, S. (2017). Editorial perspective: Neurodiversity - a revolutionary concept for autism and psychiatry. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(6), 744-747. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12703

Bartholdy, S., McClelland, J., Kekic, M., O'Daly, O. G., Campbell, I. C., Werthmann, J., Rennalls, S. J., Rubia, K., David, A. S., Glennon, D., Kern, N., & Schmidt, U. (2013). Clinical outcomes and neural correlates of 20 sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in severe and enduring anorexia nervosa (the TIARA study): Study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial. Trials, 16, 548. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1069-3

Berner, L. A., Bocarsly, M. E., Hoebel, B. G., & Avena, N. M. (2017). The role of serotonin in appetite and eating behaviour. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19(12), 100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0856-6

Bird, G., & Cook, R. (2013). Mixed emotions: The contribution of alexithymia to the emotional symptoms of autism. Translational Psychiatry, 3(7), e285. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2013.61

Bogdashina, O. (2016). Sensory perceptual issues in autism and Asperger syndrome: Different sensory experiences - Different perceptual worlds (2nd ed.). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Bottema-Beutel, K., Kapp, S. K., Lester, J. N., Sasson, N. J., & Hand, B. N. (2021). Avoiding ableist language: Suggestions for autism researchers. Autism in Adulthood, 3(1), 18-29.

Bozarth, J. D., Wilkins, P., & Witty, J. P. (2019). The person-centered approach: A contemporary introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brede, J., Babb, C., Jones, C., Elliott, M., Zanker, C., Tchanturia, K., Serpell, L., Fox, J., & Mandy, W. (2020). "For me, the anorexia is just a symptom, and the cause is the autism": Investigating restrictive eating disorders in autistic women. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50, 4280–4296.

Brewerton, T. D. (2007). Eating disorders, trauma, and comorbidity: Focus on PTSD. Eating Disorders, 15(4), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640260701454311

Brown, H. R., Sharma, I., & Freeman, J. A. (2022). The impact of trauma on individuals with autism: A review of clinical and neuroscientific findings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(4), 1785-1798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05164-4

Bryant-Waugh, R., & Kreipe, R. E. (Eds.). (2019). Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder in childhood and adolescence: A clinical guide. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Cermak, S. A., Curtin, C., & Bandini, L. G. (2010). Food selectivity and sensory sensitivity in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 110(2), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.032

Chown, N., & Leatherland, J. (2022). Neurodiversity: Key concepts, research, and practise. London: Routledge.

Clus, D., Larsen, M. E., Lemey, C., & Berrouiguet, S. (2018). The use of virtual reality in patients with eating disorders: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(4), e157.

Corstorphine, E., Waller, G., Lawson, R., & Ganis, C. (2007). Trauma and multi-impulsivity in the eating disorders. Eating Behaviors, 8(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.08.009

Dayan, J., Bernard, A., Olliac, B., Mailhes, A. S., & Kermarrec, S. (2016). Adolescent brain development, risk-taking and vulnerability to addiction. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 104(5), 279–286.

Decker, V., Balzer, L., Schaller, A., Winterhoff, P., Falkai, P., & Falter-Wagner, C. (2021). Digital interventions for people with autism spectrum disorder during the Covid-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05354-5

Dumais, A., Bouchard, S., & Moreau, N. (2020). Neural correlates of eating disorders and trauma: Insights into limbic-prefrontal dysregulation. NeuroImage: Clinical, 25, 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102127

Fairburn, C. G., & Rothwell, E. R. (2015). Apps and eating disorders: A systematic clinical appraisal. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48(7), 1038-1046.

Farrugia, S., Jakubowski, J. J., Attwood, T., & Stokes, M. A. (2021). Medication adverse effects in autistic adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autism, 25(5), 1159-1176.

Ferrer-García, M., Gutiérrez-Maldonado, J., Pla-Sanjuanelo, J., Vilalta-Abella, F., Riva, G., Wiederhold, B. K., & Baños, R. M. (2017). A randomised controlled comparison of second-level treatment approaches for treatment-resistant adults with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder: Assessing the benefits of virtual reality cue exposure therapy. European Eating Disorders Review, 25(6), 479-490.

Fisher, M. M., Rosen, D. S., Ornstein, R. M., Mammel, K. A., Katzman, D. K., Rome, E. S., Callahan, S. T., Malizio, J., Kearney, S., & Walsh, B. T. (2014). Characteristics of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents: A "new disorder" in DSM-5. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(1), 49-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.013

Foster-Fishman, P. G., Mathis, J. B., & Nowell, B. L. (2018). Building the case for participatory research: Implications for community engagement practitioners and researchers. Journal of Community practise, 26(1), 145-161.

Fox, J., & Diab, P. (2015). An exploration of the perceptions and experiences of living with chronic anorexia nervosa while an inpatient on an eating disorders unit: An interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) study. Journal of Health Psychology, 20(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105313497526

Frank, D. L., Khorshid, L., Kiffer, J. F., Moravec, C. S., & McKee, M. G. (2010). Biofeedback in medicine: who, when, why and how? Mental Health in Family Medicine, 7(2), 85-91. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2939454/

Gaudio, S., Wiemerslage, L., Brooks, S. J., & Schiöth, H. B. (2018). A systematic review of resting-state functional-MRI studies on anorexia nervosa: Evidence for functional connectivity impairment in cognitive control and visuospatial and body-signal integration networks. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00235

Green, S. A., Hernandez, L., Tottenham, N., Krasileva, K., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Dapretto, M. (2016). Neurobiology of sensory overresponsivity in youth with autism spectrum disorders. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(8), 778-786. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0737

Greenway, K. T., Leal, J., Rennert, L., Guenther, C., & Lewis, M. (2020). ADHD medication and its impact on eating patterns. Journal of Attention Disorders, 24(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054718793100

Himmerich, H., Kan, C., Au, K., & Treasure, J. (2015). Pharmacological treatment of eating disorders, comorbid mental health problems, malnutrition and physical health consequences. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 150, 180-193.

Hoover, D. W. (2015). The effects of psychological trauma on children with autism spectrum disorders: A research review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2(3), 287-299.

Hoover, D. W., & Kaufman, J. (2018). Adverse childhood experiences in children with autism spectrum disorder. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 31(2), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000390

Hwang, Y. S., Kim, Y. S., & Kim, J. H. (2015). Functional connectivity of the amygdala in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Neuroscience Letters, 585, 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.11.026

Kaisari, P., Dourish, C. T., & Higgs, S. (2017). Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and disordered eating behaviour: A systematic review and a framework for future research. Clinical Psychology Review, 53, 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.03.002

Kapp, S. K., Gillespie-Lynch, K., Sherman, L. E., & Hutman, T. (2013). Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028353

Karjalainen, L., Gillberg, C., Råstam, M., & Wentz, E. (2016). Eating disorders and eating pathology in young adult and adult patients with ESSENCE. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 66, 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.12.009

Kaye, W. H., Barbarich, N. C., Putnam, K., Gendall, K. A., Fernstrom, J., Fernstrom, M., McConaha, C. W., & Kishore, A. (2018). SSRIs and their role in treating eating disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 41(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2017.10.011

Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P. A., Chiu, W. T., Deitz, A. C., Hudson, J. I., Shahly, V., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M. C., Benjet, C., Bruffaerts, R., de Girolamo, G., de Graaf, R., Maria Haro, J., Kovess-Masfety, V., O'Neill, S., Posada-Villa, J., Sasu, C., Scott, K., ... Xavier, M. (2013). The prevalence and correlates of binge eating disorder in the World Health organisation World Mental Health Surveys. Biological Psychiatry, 73(9), 904-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.020

Kinnaird, E., Norton, C., Stewart, C., & Tchanturia, K. (2019). Same behaviours, different reasons: what do patients with co-occurring anorexia and autism want from treatment? International Review of Psychiatry, 31(4), 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2018.1531831

Kinnaird, E., Stewart, C., & Tchanturia, K. (2019). Investigating alexithymia in autism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Psychiatry, 55, 80-89.

Lai, M. C., Kassee, C., Besney, R., Bonato, S., Hull, L., Mandy, W., Szatmari, P., & Ameis, S. H. (2019). Prevalence of co-occurring mental health diagnoses in the autism population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(10), 819-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30289-530289-5)

Lester, P., Klosinski, L., Huntley, A., & Ohanian, D. (2017). Adapting a trauma treatment for use with children on the autism spectrum. Evidence-Based practise in Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2(1), 1-16.

Levine, P. A. (2010). In an unspoken voice: How the body releases trauma and restores goodness. North Atlantic Books.

Mahler, K. (2017). Interoception: The eighth sensory system: Practical solutions for improving self-regulation, self-awareness and social understanding. Shawnee Mission, KS: AAPC Publishing.

Mandy, W., & Tchanturia, K. (2015). Do women with eating disorders who have social and flexibility difficulties really have autism? A case series. Molecular Autism, 6(1), 6.

Mandy, W., & Tchanturia, K. (2015). Do women with eating disorders who have social and flexibility difficulties really have autism? A case series. Molecular Autism, 6(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-6-6

Marco, J. H., Tormo-Irun, M. P., Perpina, C., & Botella, C. (2019). Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy supported by virtual reality in the treatment of body image in eating disorders: One year follow-up. Psychiatry Research, 273, 717-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.056

Mazefsky, C. A., Herrington, J., Siegel, M., Scarpa, A., Maddox, B. B., Scahill, L., & White, S. W. (2013). The role of emotion regulation in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(7), 679-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.05.006

Mazurek, M. O. (2014). Loneliness, friendship, and well-being in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 18(3), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361312474121

Mehta, M. A., Siddiqui, M. F., Heaney, C. J., Marsh, C., Morriss, R., & McCabe, C. (2020). Neurobiological pathways of trauma and their relevance to clinical practise. Journal of Trauma and Stress, 33(6), 1030-1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22600

Monteleone, A. M., Monteleone, P., Serino, I., Amodio, R., Monaco, F., & Maj, M. (2019). Underweight subjects with anorexia nervosa have an enhanced salivary cortisol response not seen in weight restored subjects with anorexia nervosa. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 60, 84-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.06.010

Mottron, L., Dawson, M., Soulières, I., Hubert, B., & Burack, J. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: An update, and eight principles of autistic perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-005-0040-7

Nicely, T. A., Lane-Loney, S., Masciulli, E., Hollenbeak, C. S., & Ornstein, R. M. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a cohort of young patients in day treatment for eating disorders. Journal of Eating Disorders, 2(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-014-0021-3

Nordbø, R. H., Espeset, E. M., Gulliksen, K. S., Skårderud, F., & Holte, A. (2006). The meaning of self-starvation: Qualitative study of patients' perception of anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 39(7), 556-564. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20276

Panagos, P. D. (2020). Biofeedback and neurofeedback applications in the treatment of eating disorders: A review of the literature. International Journal of Behavioural and Healthcare Research, 7(1-2), 17-34.

Racine, S. E., & Wildes, J. E. (2015). Emotion dysregulation and anorexia nervosa: An exploration of the role of childhood abuse. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48(1), 55-58.

Robertson, C. E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2017). Sensory perception in autism. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(11), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.112

Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045357

SAMHSA. (2014). SAMHSA's concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma-informed approach. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4884. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

Schmidt, J., Verschuere, B., & Bögels, S. (2017). The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on automatic and effortful cognitive processes in social anxiety disorder. Journal of behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 55, 56-64.

Shapiro, F. (2017). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Singer, J. (1999). 'Why can't you be normal for once in your life?' From a 'problem with no name' to the emergence of a new category of difference. In M. Corker & S. French (Eds.), Disability discourse (pp. 59-67). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Singer, J. (2017). Neurodiversity: The birth of an idea. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0776V78FX/

Smink, F. R., van Hoeken, D., & Hoek, H. W. (2012). Epidemiology of eating disorders: Incidence, prevalence and mortality rates. Current Psychiatry Reports, 14(4), 406-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0282-y

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: SAGE.

Smolak, L., & Murnen, S. K. (2002). A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between child sexual abuse and eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31(2), 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10008

Spain, D., & Happé, F. (2020). How to optimise cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for people with autism spectrum disorders (ASD): A Delphi study. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-behaviour Therapy, 38, 184–208.

Swanson, J. M., Wigal, T ., & Volkow, N. D. (2011). Contrast of medical and nonmedical use of stimulant drugs, basis for the distinction, and risk of addiction: Comment on Smith and Farah (2011). Psychological Bulletin, 137(5), 742-748. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024898

Tchanturia, K., Larsson, E., & Adamson, J. (2016). How anorexia nervosa patients with high and low autistic traits respond to group cognitive remediation therapy. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 334. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1044-x

Thompson, J. K., & Stice, E. (2001). Thin-ideal internalization: Mounting evidence for a new risk factor for body-image disturbance and eating pathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(5), 181-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00144

Todres, L., & Galvin, K. (2010). "Dwelling-mobility": An existential theory of well-being. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 5(3), 5444. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v5i3.5444

Treasure, J., Claudino, A. M., & Zucker, N. (2015). Eating disorders. The Lancet, 385(9967), 583-593.

Treasure, J., Duarte, T. A., & Schmidt, U. (2021). Eating disorders. The Lancet, 397(10279), 899-911. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00209-400209-4)

Tredwell, A. L. (2021). Neurodiversity: How the social model of disability improves patient care. Journal of Adolescent Health. Advance online publication.

Trevisan, D. A., Bowering, M., & Birmingham, E. (2016). Alexithymia, but not autism spectrum disorder, may be related to the production of emotional facial expressions. Molecular Autism, 7(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-016-0108-6

van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. New York: Penguin.

van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.

Westwood, H., & Tchanturia, K. (2017). Autism spectrum disorder in anorexia nervosa: An updated literature review. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19(7), 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0791-9

White, H. A., & Shah, P. (2011). Creative style and achievement in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 673-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.015

Yehuda, R., Hoge, C. W., McFarlane, A. C., Vermetten, E., Lanius, R. A., Nievergelt, C. M., Hobfoll, S. E., Koenen, K. C., Neylan, T. C., & Hyman, S. E. (2015). Post-traumatic stress disorder. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 1(1), 15057. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.57

Zickgraf, H. F., & Ellis, J. M. (2018). Initial validation of the nine item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen (NIAS): A measure of three restrictive eating patterns. Appetite, 123, 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.111