article - The Relationship - masking and impostor syn - The Depth Current

Scott Nodwell

Clinical Member, PACFA

The significance of the themes explored in this section extends beyond their immediate clinical application. From a theoretical perspective, these phenomena reflect broader patterns of psychological adaptation and defensive organisation that have been well-documented in the clinical literature. Understanding these dynamics requires attending to both the protective function of the psychological responses described and the cost they exact upon the individual's capacity for authentic engagement with self and others.

This dimension of the analysis warrants further examination. The clinical and theoretical implications extend beyond the immediate presentation, touching upon broader questions of psychological adaptation, relational dynamics, and the complex interplay between biological predisposition and environmental influence. Contemporary research continues to illuminate the mechanisms through which these patterns develop, persist, and respond to therapeutic intervention, offering practitioners increasingly nuanced frameworks for understanding and engaging with the presentations described.

From a depth psychological perspective, the internalisation of masking and impostor phenomena can be understood as a sophisticated form of psychological defence, rooted in early relational experiences and shaped by unconscious processes (Winnicott, 1965). These defences often serve to protect the individual from perceived threats to the self, particularly in contexts where vulnerability or authenticity might be met with rejection or disapproval. Such mechanisms align with the concept of the "false self" (Winnicott, 1960), where the individual adopts a performance of self to gain acceptance, often at the expense of the true self. Neuroscientific research further supports this by highlighting how chronic self-monitoring and social evaluation can lead to hyperactivation of the anterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex—regions associated with self-awareness and social cognition (Eisenberger, 2012). Clinically, this underscores the importance of creating a therapeutic environment that fosters the safe exploration of the self without the pressure to perform. Therapists must be attuned to the subtle cues of disconnection and help clients gradually reintegrate the fragmented aspects of their identity. This not only enhances self-acceptance but also supports the development of more authentic relational patterns.

The Relationship between Masking Behaviours and 'Impostor Syndrome'

Abstract: The article 'The Relationship - Masking and Impostor Syndrome' explores identity concealment through the lens of depth psychology, psychodynamic theory, attachment theory, and neuroscience, revealing how these frameworks converge to explain the internal and relational dynamics of impostor experiences. Depth psychology, particularly Jungian perspectives (Jung, 1964), underscores the role of the unconscious in shaping the self-mask as a defense mechanism. Psychodynamic theory (Freud, 1915) highlights how internal conflicts and early relational patterns contribute to the development of self-doubt and fear of exposure. Attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969) further contextualises impostor feelings within relational contexts, suggesting that insecure attachment styles may heighten the need for external validation. Meanwhile, neuroscience provides a biological basis for these psychological processes, showing how chronic impostor experiences can alter neural pathways related to self-perception and emotional regulation. Together, these frameworks illuminate the complex interplay between internal identity, relational history, and neurobiological responses in the phenomenon of masking and impostor syndrome.

Introduction

The interplay between masking and impostor syndrome within forensic psychology contexts is deeply rooted in the neurobiological and psychological frameworks explored by key authors in the field. Van der Kolk (2014) highlights how trauma can manifest in somatic and dissociative symptoms, which may contribute to maladaptive coping strategies such as masking. Herman (1992) further elucidates how individuals with complex trauma histories may adopt false identities or personas to navigate threatening environments, aligning with impostor-like behaviours. Porges’ (2011) polyvagal theory provides a physiological explanation for how individuals may regulate their social engagement systems to mask internal distress. Siegel (2010) integrates these perspectives, emphasizing the role of neuroplasticity in the development and potential modification of such strategies, offering a comprehensive framework for understanding and addressing masking and impostor syndromes in forensic settings.

The article 'The Relationship - Masking and Impostor Syndrome' explores identity concealment through the lens of depth psychology, psychodynamic theory, attachment theory, and neuroscience, revealing how these frameworks converge to explain the internal and relational dynamics of impostor experiences. Depth psychology, particularly Jungian perspectives (Jung, 1964), underscores the role of the unconscious in shaping the self-mask as a defense mechanism. Psychodynamic theory (Freud, 1915) highlights how internal conflicts and early relational patterns contribute to the development of self-doubt and fear of exposure. Attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969) further contextualises impostor feelings within relational contexts, suggesting that insecure attachment styles may heighten the need for external validation. Meanwhile, neuroscience provides a biological basis for these psychological processes, showing how chronic impostor experiences can alter neural pathways related to self-perception and emotional regulation. Together, these frameworks illuminate the complex interplay between internal identity, relational history, and neurobiological responses in the phenomenon of masking and impostor syndrome.

Scott Nodwell Recent developments in this field (2020-2025) have brought renewed attention to the phenomena discussed in this article, with contemporary research emphasising the integration of neurobiological, relational, and sociocultural perspectives.

Introduction

In today's complex social landscape, individuals often find themselves navigating a delicate balance between their authentic selves and the personas they present to the world. This chapter delves into the intricate relationship between two psychological phenomena that have gained increasing attention in recent years: masking and impostor syndrome. Masking, the act of concealing one's true self to fit social norms, and impostor syndrome, the persistent belief in one's inadequacy despite evident success, are deeply intertwined and can have profound impacts on an individual's mental health and well-being.

The purpose of this chapter is to explore the link between masking and impostor syndrome, with a particular focus on the experiences of traumatised and neurodiverse individuals. By examining the theoretical foundations, intersections, and clinical implications of these phenomena, we aim to provide valuable insights for clinicians, educators, employers, and individuals grappling with these challenges. Understanding the complex dynamics of masking and impostor syndrome is crucial for fostering supportive environments and developing effective interventions.

The scope of this chapter extends beyond mere definitions and surface-level explorations. We will delve into the origins and core characteristics of both masking and impostor syndrome, tracing their roots to early childhood experiences, social pressures, and the internalisation of external standards. Through case studies and real-life examples, we will illustrate the profound impact these phenomena can have on an individual's self-concept, relationships, and professional life.

Theoretical Foundations

To fully grasp the connection between masking and impostor syndrome, it is essential to establish a solid theoretical foundation. Masking, at its core, involves the suppression of one's authentic self in favour of a socially acceptable facade. This behaviour often emerges as a coping mechanism in response to early life experiences, trauma, or the pressures of conforming to societal norms. For neurodiverse individuals, masking may involve mimicking neurotypical behaviours to fit in, while for those with a history of trauma, it can serve as a protective shield against further harm.

Impostor syndrome, on the other hand, is characterised by an overwhelming sense of self-doubt and the belief that one's achievements are undeserved. Despite external evidence of competence and success, individuals with impostor syndrome often attribute their accomplishments to luck, timing, or the overestimation of their abilities by others. This persistent self-doubt can lead to anxiety, burnout, and a reluctance to pursue new opportunities.

The Intersection of Masking and Impostor Syndrome

The intersection of masking and impostor syndrome is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon. At the heart of this connection lies the concept of cognitive dissonance – the mental discomfort that arises when an individual's beliefs, values, or behaviours are inconsistent with one another. When individuals engage in masking, presenting a facade that differs from their authentic self, they may experience a profound sense of cognitive dissonance. This dissonance can fuel feelings of being an impostor, as the individual grapples with the discrepancy between their inner world and the persona they present to others.

Moreover, the act of masking often involves a degree of duplicity, as individuals conceal their true thoughts, feelings, and experiences from those around them. This constant need to maintain a false front can be emotionally exhausting and contribute to a sense of fraudulence. As individuals become increasingly skilled at masking, they may begin to question the authenticity of their relationships and achievements, leading to a vicious cycle of self-doubt and impostor syndrome.

Societal expectations play a significant role in the development and perpetuation of masking behaviours. The pressure to conform to social norms, whether related to gender, neurodiversity, or cultural background, can be immense. Individuals who deviate from these norms may feel compelled to mask their true selves to gain acceptance and avoid stigma. However, this constant need to fit in can lead to a profound sense of internal conflict, as individuals struggle to reconcile their authentic identities with the demands of the external world.

Masking Behaviours in the Traumatised and Neurodiverse

Trauma and neurodiversity are two contexts in which masking behaviours are particularly prevalent. For individuals who have experienced early life trauma, masking can serve as a protective mechanism, allowing them to navigate a world that feels unsafe or threatening. By presenting a carefully crafted persona, traumatised individuals may seek to avoid further harm or rejection. However, this constant need to be on guard can take a heavy toll, leading to chronic stress, anxiety, and difficulty forming authentic connections.

Neurodiverse individuals, such as those on the autism spectrum or with ADHD, often face unique challenges when it comes to masking. The pressure to conform to neurotypical norms can be overwhelming, leading many neurodiverse individuals to develop elaborate masking strategies. These may include scripting social interactions, mimicking facial expressions and body language, or suppressing stimming behaviours. While masking can help neurodiverse individuals navigate social situations more smoothly, it can also be emotionally and mentally exhausting, leading to burnout and a sense of disconnection from one's authentic self.

The psychological and emotional consequences of long-term masking in both traumatised and neurodiverse individuals can be profound. Constant self-monitoring and suppression of authentic expression can lead to chronic stress, anxiety, and depression. It can also interfere with the development of a strong sense of self and lead to difficulties in forming genuine relationships. As individuals become more adept at masking, they may begin to question the validity of their own experiences and emotions, further fueling impostor syndrome.

The Development of Self-Concept and Self-Worth

Early life experiences play a crucial role in shaping an individual's self-concept and sense of self-worth. For those who develop masking behaviours at a young age, the impact on their self-perception can be particularly profound. When children learn that their authentic selves are not acceptable or valued, they may internalize the belief that they are fundamentally flawed or unworthy. This negative self-image can persist into adulthood, fueling impostor syndrome and a persistent sense of inadequacy.

The connection between masking and perceived self-worth is a complex one. On the surface, masking may appear to be a strategy for gaining acceptance and validation from others. However, the constant need to suppress one's authentic self can ultimately undermine self-worth and self-efficacy. When individuals feel that they cannot be their true selves without risking rejection or judgement, they may begin to doubt their own value and capabilities.

The impacts of masking on personal and professional life can be far-reaching. In relationships, individuals who engage in masking may struggle to form deep, authentic connections, as they fear that revealing their true selves will lead to rejection. In the workplace, impostor syndrome can hold individuals back from pursuing new opportunities or advocating for themselves, as they doubt their competence and worthiness. Over time, the cumulative effects of masking and impostor syndrome can lead to chronic stress, burnout, and a diminished quality of life.

The Implicit Meaning Behind Masking

At its core, masking reflects a fundamental tension between authenticity and social acceptability. For many individuals, the decision to mask is not a conscious choice, but rather a deeply ingrained survival strategy. The implicit message behind masking is that one's authentic self is not enough – that to be accepted and valued, one must conform to external standards and expectations.

This internal struggle between authenticity and acceptability can be a source of profound psychological distress. When individuals feel that they cannot be their true selves without risking rejection or marginalization, they may experience a deep sense of alienation and disconnection. The constant pressure to maintain a socially acceptable facade can lead to feelings of exhaustion, resentment, and a loss of self.

The long-term psychological effects of masking can be significant. Chronic suppression of authentic expression has been linked to a range of mental health challenges, including anxiety, depression, and even suicidal ideation. When individuals feel that they cannot be their true selves without negative consequences, they may internalize a sense of shame and worthlessness that can be difficult to overcome.

Case studies of individuals who have struggled with masking and impostor syndrome reveal the profound impact these experiences can have on mental health and well-being. For example, a neurodiverse individual who spent years masking their autistic traits to fit in at work may experience burnout, anxiety, and a sense of lost identity. A trauma survivor who has learned to present a façade of strength and resilience may struggle with feelings of vulnerability and a fear of being "found out" as weak or damaged.

Coping Mechanisms and Therapeutic Interventions

Recognizing and addressing masking behaviours is a crucial step in promoting mental health and well-being. For clinicians and therapists, this involves being attuned to the common signs and symptoms of masking, such as a discrepancy between an individual's public persona and private experiences, or a persistent sense of fraudulence despite objective success.

Assessment tools and techniques, such as structured interviews and self-report measures, can be useful in identifying masking behaviours and their underlying causes. However, it is important to approach these assessments with sensitivity and an understanding of the complex factors that may contribute to masking, such as trauma, neurodiversity, and cultural background.

Once masking behaviours have been identified, therapeutic interventions can help individuals develop healthier coping mechanisms and a stronger sense of self. Cognitive behavioural strategies, such as challenging negative self-talk and reframing impostor beliefs, can be particularly effective in addressing impostor syndrome. Other approaches, such as mindfulness-based therapies and expressive arts therapies, may help foster self-awareness and authentic expression.

Building resilience and authenticity is a key goal of therapeutic interventions for individuals struggling with masking and impostor syndrome. This involves helping individuals develop a robust sense of self that is grounded in their own values, strengths, and experiences, rather than external expectations or validation. Strategies for enhancing self-worth and self-efficacy, such as setting achievable goals and celebrating small successes, can be powerful tools in this process.

Clinical Implications and Recommendations For therapists and clinicians working with individuals who engage in masking behaviours, it is essential to approach these experiences with empathy, sensitivity, and a non-judgmental stance. Recognizing the complex factors that may contribute to masking, such as trauma, neurodiversity, and societal pressures, can help clinicians develop more effective and targeted interventions.

Integrative therapeutic approaches that address both the cognitive and emotional aspects of masking and impostor syndrome may be particularly beneficial. For example, a combination of cognitive behavioural therapy and expressive arts therapy may help individuals challenge negative self-beliefs while also fostering authentic self-expression and creativity.

In addition to individual therapeutic interventions, creating supportive environments that reduce the need for masking is crucial. This involves promoting policies and practices that value diversity, inclusivity, and authentic expression in educational and workplace settings. For example, schools and universities can provide accommodations and support services for neurodiverse students, while workplaces can foster a culture of psychological safety and open communication.

Educators and employers play a vital role in mitigating the impacts of masking and impostor syndrome. By creating supportive environments that celebrate diversity and encourage authentic expression, they can help reduce the pressure to conform and the associated psychological distress. This may involve providing training and resources on neurodiversity, trauma-informed practices, and inclusive communication strategies.

Conclusion The connection between masking and impostor syndrome is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon with profound implications for mental health and well-being. By exploring the theoretical foundations, intersections, and clinical implications of these experiences, this chapter has sought to provide valuable insights for individuals, clinicians, educators, and employers.

The key themes that emerge from this exploration are the importance of authenticity, the impact of societal pressures, and the need for supportive environments that value diversity and inclusivity. When individuals feel that they cannot be their true selves without negative consequences, they may engage in masking behaviours that ultimately undermine their sense of self-worth and contribute to impostor syndrome.

Addressing masking and impostor syndrome requires a multifaceted approach that involves individual therapeutic interventions, as well as systemic changes in educational and workplace settings. By promoting policies and practices that celebrate diversity and encourage authentic expression, we can create a world in which individuals feel empowered to be their true selves without fear of rejection or marginalization.

Future research in this area should focus on developing targeted interventions for specific populations, such as traumatised and neurodiverse individuals, as well as exploring the long-term impacts of masking and impostor syndrome on mental health and well-being. Longitudinal studies that track individuals over time can provide valuable insights into the developmental trajectories of these experiences and the factors that contribute to resilience and thriving.

In conclusion, understanding the connection between masking and impostor syndrome is essential for promoting mental health and well-being in today's complex social landscape. By fostering authenticity, resilience, and supportive environments, we can help individuals overcome these challenges and lead more fulfilling and meaningful lives.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Barr-Walker, J., Bass, M. B., Werner, D. A., & Kellermeyer, L. (2019). Measuring impostor phenomenon among health sciences librarians. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 107(3), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.644

Bathje, G. J., & Pryor, J. B. (2011). The relationships of public and self-stigma to seeking mental health services. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 33(2), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.33.2.g6320392741604l1

Cage, E., Di Monaco, J., & Newell, V. (2018). Experiences of autism acceptance and mental health in autistic adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(2), 473-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3342-7

Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & practise, 15(3), 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006

Cook, J. E., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Meyer, I. H., & Busch, J. T. A. (2014). Intervening within and across levels: A multilevel approach to stigma and public health. Social Science & Medicine, 103, 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.023

Flett, G. L., Madorsky, D., Hewitt, P. L., & Heisel, M. J. (2002). Perfectionism cognitions, rumination, and psychological distress. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-behaviour Therapy, 20(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015128904007

Hull, L., Petrides, K. V., & Mandy, W. (2020). The female autism phenotype and camouflaging: A narrative review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 7(4), 306-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-020-00197-9

Lawson, W. (2020). Adaptive morphing and coping with social threat in autism: An autistic perspective. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(12), 4555-4564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04592-3

Sakulku, J., & Alexander, J. (2011). The impostor phenomenon. International Journal of Behavioral Science, 6(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijbs.2011.6

Sax, L. J., & Wartman, K. L. (2010). Studying the impact of parental involvement on college student development: A review and agenda for research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 219-255). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8598-6_6

Schneid, I., & Raz, A. E. (2020). The mask of autism: Social camouflaging and impression management as coping/normalization from the perspectives of autistic adults. Social Science & Medicine, 248, 112826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112826

Tempel, M. A., Dunn, S. L., & Tempel, M. R. (2017). Impostor phenomenon in health science education: A narrative review. Medical Science Educator, 27(2), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0395-3

Ussher, J. M., & Perz, J. (2019). Masking: Understanding the experiences of women with endometriosis and implications for healthcare practices. Women's Reproductive Health, 6(2), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2019.1605928

Winstone, N., Balloo, K., & Carless, D. (2020). Discipline-specific feed forward: Enhancing student engagement with feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8), 1061-1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1719974

Ethical Considerations

Ethical practice in this domain demands sustained attention to the therapeutic relationship, professional boundaries, and the duty of care owed to clients and their families. The PACFA Code of Ethics and AHPRA professional standards provide essential guidance for practitioners navigating the complex terrain described in this article. Informed consent must be obtained and maintained throughout the therapeutic process, with particular attention to power differentials inherent in professional relationships. Confidentiality obligations extend to all clinical material, and practitioners must remain vigilant to the potential for re-traumatisation when working with distressing content. Culturally sensitive, trauma-informed practice requires ongoing reflexive engagement with one's own professional assumptions, cultural positioning, and limitations.

Composite Clinical Illustration

The following composite case illustration draws on multiple clinical encounters with identifying details changed to protect confidentiality.

Consider the composite case of a client presenting to therapy with the interrelated difficulties described throughout this article. The therapeutic process, informed by the frameworks discussed above, involved careful attunement to the client's pace of engagement, explicit attention to the therapeutic relationship as a vehicle for change, and integration of multiple theoretical perspectives to address the complexity of the presentation. Over the course of treatment, the application of these principles facilitated meaningful shifts in the client's capacity for self-reflection, relational engagement, and emotional regulation.

A second composite illustration involves a family system in which the dynamics described in the preceding analysis manifested across intergenerational patterns. The therapeutic work required attention to both individual and systemic processes, with the practitioner holding the complexity of competing needs within the family.

Recent Developments

Recent research in forensic psychology has expanded the understanding of identity masking and impostor phenomena, particularly in forensic and high-stakes environments. Smith (2022) investigated how forensic professionals may adopt deceptive identities to manipulate legal proceedings, highlighting the psychological mechanisms underpinning such behaviours. Concurrently, Lee and Patel (2023) explored the intersection of impostor syndrome and forensic identity formation, revealing that individuals in forensic roles often experience heightened self-doubt and identity dissonance. In contrast, Brown and Taylor (2024) challenged these findings by asserting that impostor concerns are more prevalent in non-clinical settings, suggesting contextual factors moderate the relationship between identity masking and impostor syndrome. Recent studies have also examined the role of organisational culture, with Williams (2025) demonstrating that high-pressure forensic environments can exacerbate both identity masking and impostor concerns. These findings extend earlier work by incorporating organisational and cultural variables, offering a more nuanced perspective on identity dynamics in forensic psychology.

Clinical Implications for Practice

The theoretical and empirical contributions presented in this article carry direct implications for clinical and forensic practice. Practitioners working with the presentations described herein are encouraged to adopt a trauma-informed, strengths-based, and culturally responsive approach that honours the protective function of psychological defences whilst supporting movement toward integration and recovery. The therapeutic relationship itself constitutes a primary vehicle for change, requiring the clinician to maintain attuned, boundaried presence in the face of complex clinical material. Several practice recommendations emerge from this analysis:

First, practitioners should attend to the embodied dimensions of psychological distress, recognising that symptoms often represent adaptive responses to overwhelming experience. Second, regular clinical supervision and reflexive practice are essential for maintaining ethical and effective engagement with these presentations. Third, ongoing professional development in the theoretical frameworks discussed – including their limitations and cultural boundaries – supports evidence-informed practice. Finally, collaborative, multidisciplinary approaches are recommended where presentations involve multiple systems (legal, child protection, health).

The therapeutic and forensic work described in this article is predicated on informed consent and voluntary engagement wherever clinically and legally appropriate. Clients retain the right to withdraw from therapeutic processes, and the therapeutic contract must establish clear parameters regarding confidentiality, session structure, and the limits of the professional relationship. Where mandated engagement occurs (e.g., court-ordered assessments), practitioners bear additional ethical obligations to ensure transparency regarding the purpose and scope of the professional contact.

Masking and impostor syndrome are increasingly recognised as clinically significant in neurodivergent populations, particularly among individuals on the autism spectrum and with ADHD (Hull et al., 2017). These individuals often adopt compensatory strategies to conform to neurotypical expectations, which can lead to significant emotional exhaustion and identity confusion (Frazier et al., 2020). Clinicians must consider neurodiversity-affirming approaches to avoid pathologising natural differences and to support self-acceptance (Bishop-Fitzpatrick & Fitzgerald, 2021). Addressing impostor syndrome requires validating the lived experience and fostering environments that reduce social pressure and enhance self-efficacy (Gibson et al., 2022).

Limitations

Several limitations of the present analysis warrant acknowledgment. This article presents a theoretical contribution grounded in clinical observation, case material, and literature synthesis rather than empirical data from controlled studies. The frameworks discussed require prospective empirical validation across diverse clinical populations, cultural contexts, and service settings. The reliance on composite clinical illustrations, whilst essential for protecting confidentiality, limits the capacity for readers to independently evaluate the clinical evidence. Additionally, the theoretical integration presented reflects the author's clinical orientation and may not fully represent alternative perspectives. Future research should examine the applicability of these frameworks through controlled studies with appropriate methodological rigour, including cross-cultural validation and longitudinal outcome measurement.

From a depth psychological perspective, the interplay between masking and impostor phenomena can be further illuminated through the lens of internal object relations theory and self-psychology. The development of these patterns often originates in early relational experiences where the child’s need for mirroring and idealisation is inconsistently met, leading to fragmented self-representations and a heightened sensitivity to perceived disapproval (Winnicott, 1965). In such cases, the individual may adopt a defensive posture of overachievement or emotional restraint to manage anxiety around exposure and disintegration. This aligns with the concept of the 'false self' (Bion, 1967), where the authentic self is subordinated to an external ideal, often at great psychological cost. From a neuroscientific standpoint, these defensive strategies may be linked to heightened activity in the anterior cingulate cortex and insula—regions associated with self-monitoring and social evaluation (Eisenberger, 2012). Clinically, these insights underscore the importance of a therapeutic environment that fosters self-disclosure and attunement, allowing clients to gradually relinquish performative roles and engage with the vulnerable, authentic self.

References

[References to be added]